1953 Talbot Baby vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Talbot Baby (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot Baby weights approximately 886 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Talbot Baby | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Talbot | Zastava |
| Model | Baby | 102 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 2690 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2160 mm |
