1953 Talbot Baby vs. 2010 Scion tC
To start off, 2010 Scion tC is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Scion tC (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1953 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC should accelerate faster than 1953 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot Baby weights approximately 338 kg more than 2010 Scion tC.
Because 1953 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Talbot Baby | 2010 Scion tC | |
Make | Talbot | Scion |
Model | Baby | tC |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 2690 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1318 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2700 mm |