1953 Talbot Baby vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (234 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1953 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1953 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot Baby weights approximately 326 kg more than 2010 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Talbot Baby | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Talbot | Toyota |
Model | Baby | Tundra |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 2690 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 234 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2610 mm |