1953 Talbot Baby vs. 2011 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2011 Toyota Tundra is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Tundra (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1953 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1953 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot Baby weights approximately 582 kg more than 2011 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Talbot Baby | 2011 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Talbot | Toyota |
| Model | Baby | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 2690 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 233 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1074 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2610 mm |
