1953 Talbot Baby vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Talbot Baby (108 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1953 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Talbot Baby | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Talbot | Chevrolet |
| Model | Baby | Aveo |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 2690 cc | 1248 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2525 mm |
