1953 Toyota Super vs. 1996 Volvo S40
To start off, 1996 Volvo S40 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Toyota Super. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Toyota Super would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo S40 (89 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1953 Toyota Super. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1953 Toyota Super.
Because 1953 Toyota Super is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Toyota Super. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Toyota Super | 1996 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Super | S40 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1870 cc |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
