1953 Toyota Super vs. 2012 Honda Fit
To start off, 2012 Honda Fit is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Toyota Super. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Toyota Super would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda Fit (117 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1953 Toyota Super. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1953 Toyota Super.
Because 1953 Toyota Super is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Toyota Super. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Toyota Super | 2012 Honda Fit | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | Super | Fit |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1453 cc | 1500 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 117 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |