1953 Triumph Mayflower vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 497 kg more than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (400 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (79 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Triumph Mayflower.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Triumph Mayflower | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Triumph | Volvo |
Model | Mayflower | S60 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1247 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 63 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 954 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 68 L |