1953 Triumph Mayflower vs. 2010 Dodge Nitro
To start off, 2010 Dodge Nitro is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Nitro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Nitro (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Nitro should accelerate faster than 1953 Triumph Mayflower.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Nitro (359 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (79 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Nitro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Triumph Mayflower.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Triumph Mayflower | 2010 Dodge Nitro | |
Make | Triumph | Dodge |
Model | Mayflower | Nitro |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1247 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 359 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1857 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1775 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2764 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 74 L |