1953 Triumph Mayflower vs. 2012 Holden Barina
To start off, 2012 Holden Barina is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Barina is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Triumph Mayflower is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Triumph Mayflower. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Barina (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (79 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2012 Holden Barina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Triumph Mayflower.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Triumph Mayflower | 2012 Holden Barina | |
Make | Triumph | Holden |
Model | Mayflower | Barina |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1247 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 79 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1650 mm |