1954 Abarth Renault vs. 1986 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1986 Ford Tempo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Abarth Renault. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Abarth Renault would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Abarth Renault (109 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1986 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Abarth Renault should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Tempo weights approximately 215 kg more than 1954 Abarth Renault.
Because 1954 Abarth Renault is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Abarth Renault. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Abarth Renault | 1986 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | Renault | Tempo |
Year Released | 1954 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2540 mm |