1954 Abarth Renault vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Abarth Renault. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Abarth Renault would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1954 Abarth Renault. (109 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1954 Abarth Renault. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 907 kg more than 1954 Abarth Renault. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Abarth Renault. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Abarth Renault | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | Renault | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2103 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2423 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |