1954 Abarth Simca vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1965 Riley Kestrel is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Abarth Simca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Abarth Simca would be higher. At 1,220 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Abarth Simca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Riley Kestrel (53 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1954 Abarth Simca. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1954 Abarth Simca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 67 kg more than 1954 Abarth Simca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Abarth Simca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Abarth Simca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Abarth Simca | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Abarth | Riley |
| Model | Simca | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 1220 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 818 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2380 mm |
