1954 AC Aceca vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 210 kg more than 1954 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 AC Aceca | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Aceca | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1989 |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1910 mm |
