1954 AC Aceca vs. 1999 Dodge Charger
To start off, 1999 Dodge Charger is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (325 HP) has 234 more horse power than 1954 AC Aceca. (91 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1954 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Charger weights approximately 190 kg more than 1954 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 AC Aceca | 1999 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | AC | Dodge |
| Model | Aceca | Charger |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 325 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1080 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 4760 mm |
