1954 AC Aceca vs. 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy
To start off, 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy (133 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1954 AC Aceca. (91 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy should accelerate faster than 1954 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 AC Aceca weights approximately 140 kg more than 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy (178 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 AC Aceca. (149 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 AC Aceca | 2003 Pininfarina Enjoy | |
| Make | AC | Pininfarina |
| Model | Aceca | Enjoy |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4850 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1080 mm |
