1954 AC Aceca vs. 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 AC Aceca would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV weights approximately 190 kg more than 1954 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 AC Aceca | 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Aceca | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2550 mm |