1954 AC Aceca vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 269 more horse power than 1954 AC Aceca. (91 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1954 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 AC Aceca. (149 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1954 AC Aceca | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
Make | AC | Holden |
Model | Aceca | Commodore |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 149 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |