1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1947 Austin A 40
To start off, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP) has 232 more horse power than 1947 Austin A 40. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin A 40 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1947 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | 6C | A 40 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1947 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 39 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 65.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 48 L |