1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1948 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1948 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1948 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 160 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1948 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1948 Jeep CJ2A | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
| Model | 6C | CJ2A |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2040 mm |
