1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1952 Allard K3
To start off, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1952 Allard K3 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Allard |
Model | 6C | K3 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 4375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 59 L |