1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 345 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | 6C | XK |
Year Released | 1954 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 106 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 63 L |