1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 500 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Studebaker |
Model | 6C | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1954 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 4735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2980 mm |