1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1961 Austin A 40
To start off, 1961 Austin A 40 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 190 kg more than 1961 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1961 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | 6C | A 40 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 62.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 26 L |