1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1964 Austin A 60
To start off, 1964 Austin A 60 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP) has 211 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 60. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 60 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1964 Austin A 60 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
| Model | 6C | A 60 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 34 L |
