1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1966 Ford Cortina
To start off, 1966 Ford Cortina is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP) has 222 more horse power than 1966 Ford Cortina. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 55 kg more than 1966 Ford Cortina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1966 Ford Cortina | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 6C | Cortina |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 63 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 895 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 36 L |
