1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1967 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1967 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1967 Cadillac Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1195 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1967 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 6C | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 2145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 82 L |
