1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1973 Chrysler Charger
To start off, 1973 Chrysler Charger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler Charger. (252 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 430 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1973 Chrysler Charger | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
| Model | 6C | Charger |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 5899 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2680 mm |
