1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1979 Kia Brisa
To start off, 1979 Kia Brisa is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1979 Kia Brisa. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1979 Kia Brisa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 158 kg more than 1979 Kia Brisa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1979 Kia Brisa | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Kia |
| Model | 6C | Brisa |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 792 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2270 mm |
