1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 1979 Mazda 626 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mazda 626 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 6C | 626 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2520 mm |