1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1988 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1988 Ford Tempo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1988 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1988 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Ford Tempo weights approximately 200 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1988 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 6C | Tempo |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2307 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 93.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 84 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2540 mm |
