1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1991 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1991 Ford Mustang is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1991 Ford Mustang. (106 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Ford Mustang weights approximately 310 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1991 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | Mustang |
Year Released | 1954 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 45 L |