1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1993 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,956 cc (8 cylinders), 1993 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1993 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1993 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1993 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 6C | E |
Year Released | 1954 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 5956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 375 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 100.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 94.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 90 L |