1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1995 BMW M3
To start off, 1995 BMW M3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW M3 (282 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 BMW M3 weights approximately 515 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1995 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
| Model | 6C | M3 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 85.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1465 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 65 L |
