1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1996 Lada 110
To start off, 1996 Lada 110 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1996 Lada 110. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada 110.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1996 Lada 110 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Lada |
| Model | 6C | 110 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 71 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2500 mm |
