1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 610 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mazda Sentia has automatic transmission and 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mazda Sentia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
| Model | 6C | Sentia |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2952 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 70 L |
