1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1997 Audi A4
To start off, 1997 Audi A4 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Audi A4 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1997 Audi A4 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
| Model | 6C | A4 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 62 L |
