1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2000 Audi TT
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2000 Audi TT. (180 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi TT weights approximately 360 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2000 Audi TT | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
Model | 6C | TT |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 86.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2430 mm |