1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2000 BMW 320
To start off, 2000 BMW 320 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2000 BMW 320. (170 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 320 weights approximately 515 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2000 BMW 320 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
Model | 6C | 320 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 72 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 63 L |