1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2000 Suzuki XL6
To start off, 2000 Suzuki XL6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 2000 Suzuki XL6. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2000 Suzuki XL6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Suzuki XL6 weights approximately 495 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2000 Suzuki XL6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki XL6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Suzuki XL6 has automatic transmission and 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Suzuki XL6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2000 Suzuki XL6 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Suzuki |
Model | 6C | XL6 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2490 mm |