1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2000 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2000 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2000 Toyota RAV4. (146 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota RAV4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota RAV4 weights approximately 325 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2000 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2000 Toyota RAV4 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
| Model | 6C | RAV4 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 57 L |
