1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2002 BMW Z3
To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2002 BMW Z3. (229 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW Z3 weights approximately 455 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2002 BMW Z3 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
| Model | 6C | Z3 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 229 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 89.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1405 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 51 L |
