1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2002 Dodge Razor
To start off, 2002 Dodge Razor is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Razor. (251 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Razor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Razor weights approximately 185 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2002 Dodge Razor | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
| Model | 6C | Razor |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1135 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 76 L |
