1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP) has 177 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2490 mm |