1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2004 Ford Mustang. (190 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 542 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 6C | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 3801 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 86 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1492 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 59 L |
