1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2006 Buick LaCrosse
To start off, 2006 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,785 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2006 Buick LaCrosse. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2006 Buick LaCrosse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 600 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2006 Buick LaCrosse | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Buick |
Model | 6C | LaCrosse |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 3785 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 200 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 64 L |