1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2006 Chevrolet SSR
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 128 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2006 Chevrolet SSR | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | SSR |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 401 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 91.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1078 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 95 L |