1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2006 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2006 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
| Model | 6C | Charger |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 6063 cc |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 425 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 72 L |
