1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2006 Ford E-150
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-150 weights approximately 766 kg more than 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2006 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | E-150 |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 132 L |