1954 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C (271 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2009 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | 6C | UTE |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |